HRERA complaint by Discovery Park buyers pending against BPTP's SkyNest project
The complaint says SkyNest's land and revised plans fall within the older Discovery Park licence; HRERA has made no ruling on the merits.

Key points
- HRERA Panchkula considered a representation-cum-complaint against BPTP Limited on 29 July 2026; the matter has been adjourned to September and later dates.
- The complainants say SkyNest's land is part of the licensed area of Discovery Park and that revised plans of 5 March 2026 lacked the consent of two-thirds of existing allottees.
- BPTP has reported about 150 SkyNest sales worth roughly ₹750 crore; this is the developer's own figure, not a confirmed collection.
- HRERA has not ruled on the merits, and the material reviewed shows no cancellation of SkyNest's registration.
On 29 July 2026, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA), Panchkula, considered a representation-cum-complaint against BPTP Limited. The complaint was filed by allottees of the company's older Discovery Park project in Sector 80, Faridabad, and concerns its newer SkyNest Towers in the same sector. The authority has not decided the complaint. It has been adjourned, and no finding has been made on its merits.
The matter comes as BPTP publicises SkyNest sales. In October 2026, the company said it had sold about 150 apartments at the project, valued at roughly ₹750 crore. That is the developer's own sales figure. It does not show how much of the amount has been collected. The company has not publicly addressed the Discovery Park representation in those announcements.
What the complainants allege
Discovery Park is registered with HRERA under No. 297 of 2017 for about 10.74 acres. SkyNest has a separate registration, HRERA-PKL-FBD-881-2026, dated 9 April 2026. The complainants say SkyNest's land forms part of the larger area originally licensed for Discovery Park, under licence No. 44 of 2008 for a 16.331-acre group housing colony. Their main points are:
- Section 14 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, governs changes to sanctioned plans. The complainants say revised building plans dated 5 March 2026 were obtained without the consent of two-thirds of the existing allottees, which they say the law required.
- A DTCP Haryana public notice on changes to approved building plans is also cited in the complaint.
- Building plans approved on 27 June 2012 covered the full 16.331 acres, with 12 towers of 15 floors each, EWS housing, two schools, a shopping complex and a clubhouse. The complainants say the schools, remaining towers and common amenities from that layout have not been delivered.
- The complaint's own acreage figures do not reconcile. It gives 10.74 acres for Discovery Park and 5.931 acres for SkyNest, which together exceed the 16.331 acres of the original licence.
Unit numbers for SkyNest also differ across public material. Launch coverage refers to 325 apartments, while an August 2026 awards announcement cited 504 units. At 150 sales, that is about 46% of the first figure or about 30% of the second.
What HRERA has and has not decided
The authority directed its office to send the complaint to BPTP by email and registered post. The company must file a reply at least one week before the next hearing. The hearing was adjourned to 9 September 2026 and then to 16 September 2026. A later listing shows a date of 14 October 2026, with no substantive order uploaded for that date in the material reviewed. HRERA has not ruled on the merits. The proceedings reviewed do not establish that BPTP committed fraud in connection with SkyNest or Discovery Park. In the material reviewed, the regulator has not cancelled SkyNest's registration because of this complaint. No court has convicted BPTP Limited or any of its directors of criminal fraud in the matters described.
What buyers and the developer must do next
BPTP must file its reply with HRERA at least one week before the next hearing. The authority will then decide whether the complaint has merit. No date for a final decision has been reported. A pending complaint is not a finding against the developer, but it does leave open the land-boundary and plan-consent questions. SkyNest buyers should ask BPTP in writing whether the land and the 5 March 2026 revised plans carry the consent the complainants say is required. They should also check the sanctioned plans and the registration details on the Haryana RERA website. No possession date or occupancy certificate for the SkyNest towers has been reported. Discovery Park owners can follow the complaint through its item number on the same portal.
Spotted an error? Tell our editors · Corrections policy